Search for: "Linex Technologies, Inc. "
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On May 6, 2011, Linex Technologies, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida (“Linex”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:44 pm
Pender issued Order No. 21 in Certain Wireless Communication Devices and Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (337-TA-775) denying Respondents Apple Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Aruba Networks, Inc., Meru Networks, and Ruckus Wireless’s (collectively, “Respondents”) motion to compel the production of documents and testimony from Complainant Linex Technologies, Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Pender issued Order No. 20 in Certain Wireless Communication Devices and Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same (337-TA-775) denying Respondents Apple, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Aruba Networks, Inc., Meru Networks, and Ruckus Wireless’s (collectively, “Respondents”) motion to compel the production of documents improperly withheld by Complainant Linex Technologies, Inc. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
The Order denied Complainant Linex Technologies, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:54 pm
In the Order, ALJ Pender granted a motion filed by Complainant Linex Technologies, Inc. to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of its complaint against Respondents Apple, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Aruba Networks, Inc., Meru Networks, and Ruckus Wireless. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 12:31 pm
Linex Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
Linex Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
The investigation is based on a May 6, 2011 complaint filed by Linex Technologies, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain wireless communication devices and systems, components thereof, and products containing same that infringe U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Linex Technologies, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and the Respondents are Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California, Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California, Aruba Networks, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California, Meru Networks of Sunnyvale, California, and Ruckus Wireless of Sunnyvale, California. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:55 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Linex Technologies, Inc. of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and the Respondents are Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California, Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California, Aruba Networks, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California, Meru Networks of Sunnyvale, California, and Ruckus Wireless of Sunnyvale, California. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
Align Technology, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
Apple Inc. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:11 am
Twitter, Inc. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:38 am
– Google’s cloud computing plans and computer lawyers’ expanding field of legal knowledge (Singularity Law) New advocacy group pushes OSS for the USA (Ars Technica) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Motion re infringement contentions granted in part: Linex Technologies, Inc v Belkin Intern, Inc (EDTexweblog.com) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Digital… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Copyright protection expiration in China: lifetime plus fifty (IP Dragon) EU experience and practice must show China the way concerning IPR protection at exhibitions (IP Dragon) Comparison between IPR in China relevant provisions of Foreign Trade Law 2004 and 1994 (IP Dragon) Thesis and publications about IPR in China (IP Dragon) 2009: New trends in China’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights (China Law Insight) Best practices in technology transfer and IP… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper report – Making the… [read post]
